- DISPLAY FLOAT IN MODBUS POLL SOFTWARE SERIAL
- DISPLAY FLOAT IN MODBUS POLL SOFTWARE FULL
- DISPLAY FLOAT IN MODBUS POLL SOFTWARE REGISTRATION
This wouldn’t show up with old-style 1-9999 addressing as found in most simple slaves. an overflow if the binding or libraries it incorporates is using 16-bit integer or buffer internally somewhere. It seems deeply suspicious that your observed change in behaviour is around (word) register offset 28,000 which is byte addressing 66,000 i.e. It’s up to the user to configure sensible values for each unique device. It can acquire data in integer, unsigned decimal, and floating point formats.
DISPLAY FLOAT IN MODBUS POLL SOFTWARE SERIAL
And I think you are correct, it should pass values in the 0-65,535 range, not try to enforce adherence to any standard that few devices fully follow in practice. Modscan32 is a 32-bit Windows application (Modscan64 is similar, but for 64-bit Windows) that serves as a Modbus master device for protocol testing and performing Modbus serial and TCP/IP data collection by polling at user-defined intervals down to milliseconds. We do not host any torrent files or links of Modbus Poll on, , etc.
DISPLAY FLOAT IN MODBUS POLL SOFTWARE REGISTRATION
The binding should put this offset out unmolested in the actual protocol. Using Modbus Poll Free Download crack, warez, password, serial numbers, torrent, keygen, registration codes, key generators is illegal and your business could subject you to lawsuits and leave your operating systems without patches. Strictly speaking it’s the offset-1 since we want to start from zero not 1. the address without the 40,000 (old standard) or 400,000 (current practice) “prefix”. I believe what should happen though is that we should specify the offset in OH config, i.e. This whole area confuses me, dunno about anyone else. Umm, well de-facto extensions are not the same as formal standards. "according to wikipedia the range for holding registers was extended to 400001-465535" To complete the picture, trying reading the same register pairs as uint32 datatype to see if it is the reading process and/or the floating point parsing process that is inconsistent. Should I report this on github so the modbus contributors see it easier?
DISPLAY FLOAT IN MODBUS POLL SOFTWARE FULL
To be clear, with other software such as AdvancedHmi, it read every single one of these registers correctly and always returned the full float string, so definitely something Openhab specific. That was fun to diagnose! I changed numbers pretty quick so I’m not sure exactly what register number the bug starts appearing, but it’s somewhere around 28707, I’ll try to figure out the exact number later. once the register it was trying to read got down to about 28707, the bug disappeared, it stopped only displaying “67.0”, and started showing the proper value of “67.10687255859375” Then in OpenHab config, the only thing I changed was the “modbus:=28685” line - changing the number lower and lower until the bug disappeared. To deduce this, in my PLC I copied the same long float number to a huge block of floating point registers from about 28685 to 28755 - so to be clear, all these registers hold the exact same floating point value. This behavior of rounding and not grabbing the full float string only happens when polling modbus registers above about 28707. Discovered something extremely strange which I think definitely confirms it’s a bug in the modbus binding.